






| |

Ubatuba
UFO Fragments, 1957
On
September 14, 1957, Ibrahim Sued, a columnist for the Rio de Janeiro newspaper 0
Globo, printed a letter which he had received, concerning a UFO incident.
Accompanying the letter were three small pieces of white metal. Thus was ushered
in one of the most controversial of all physical-evidence cases. The writer of
the letter described an event in which a "flying disk" exploded over the beach
at Ubatuba, in Sao Paulo Province.
Some of
the metal, which had "rained down" from the exploding disk, was collected, and
three small pieces were included in the letter to Sued. Unfortunately, the
signature on the letter was illegible. Furthermore, the identity of all
witnesses to the original seaside event at Ubatuba remains unknown, despite
extensive searches by the Brazilian representative of the AERIAL PHENOMENA
RESEARCH ORGANIZATION (APRO), Dr. Olavo FONTES. This lack of witnesses is one of
the greatest weaknesses of the Ubatuba case.
This piece
of metal was picked up after a UFO explosion over Toninha's Beach, in Ubatuba,
Sao Paula State, Brazil, in 1957. This sample was analyzed and the results
showed a 99.99% pure magnesium. This other piece fell down from one of the three
UFO's that had flown over the city of Caminas, Sao Paulo State, Brazil, on
December, 1954. Tests proved the material to be 88.91% pure tin. Mr. Sued gave
all three pieces of metal to Dr. Fontes, who in turn had one of them analyzed at
the Mineral Production Laboratory of the Department of Mineral Production in the
Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture. Dr. Fontes personally delivered the samples
to the chief chemist, Dr. Fiegl, an internationally known specialist. A
qualitative, acid test was first made on a small chip, which showed that the
fragments were truly metallic.
One of the
original fragments, designated Sample No.1 by Dr. Fontes, was subdivided into
several pieces and two of the pieces were submitted to the Spectrographic
Section of the Mineral Production Laboratory Semi-Quantitative Emmission
Spectrochemical Analysis. One of the pieces was analyzed by Dr. Luisa Maria A.
Barbosa. The analysis surprisingly revealed that the sample contained only the
element magnesium. A second fragment of Sample No.1 was submitted to a separate
spectrographic analysis by Mr. Elson Teixeira of the Mineral Production
Laboratory. Mr. Teixeira confirmed Dr. Barbosa's finding that Sample No.1 was
pure magnesium. Further tests were run on fragments of Sample No. 1. These
included Debye-Scherrer-Hull powder pattern X-ray diffraction analysis, density
measurement, and radiation tests.
The
significance of Dr. Barbosa's and Mr. Teixeira's findings is that it is
impossible to produce any element, terrestrially, that is absolutely
spectrographically pure. These results, therefore, are often cited by proponents
of UFO extraterrestrial existence as proof that the Ubatuba material must be
EXTRATERRESTRIAL. Unfortunately, this supposition cannot be proven, due to the
lack of any further Sample No.1 fragments for verification analysis. The Ubatuba
incident is certainly in need of futher verification, especially the details of
the UFO incident itself. All we have is the word of one anonymous person who
wrote the letter received by a newspaper. The case itself is dated by the
receipt of the letter, and not the incident of the crash, so there are no first
hand witnesses to the UFO incident itself.
|
Kentucky Train Collision with Disk UFO, 2002 |
|
Paintsville,
Kentucky -- At exactly 2:47 a.m. on January 14, 2002, while working
a coal train enroute from Russell, Kentucky to Shelbiana, Kentucky,
our trailing unit and first two cars were severely damaged as we
struck an unknown floating or hovering object. I know it was 2:47
because my watch froze, and to this day shows that time. Along with
my watch the entire electrical systems on both locomotives went
haywire. Approaching a bend near milepost 42 in an area referred to
as the Wild Kingdom, for the many different types of animals spotted
there, my conductor and I saw lights coming from around the way.
This ordinarily means another train is coming and will pass on the
other track. The outlay of the area is this, the river, #1 track, #2
tracks and a straight up mountainside, carved out for the laying of
these tracks. I killed our lights as not to blind the oncoming crew.
As we rounded the corner our onboard computer began to flash in and
out, speed recorder went nuts, and both locomotives died. Alarm
bells began to ring and that’s when we saw the objects. Apparently
scanning the river for something. At least three objects had several
"search" lights trained there, the first object hovered about 10 to
12 feet above the track.
It was metallic silver in color with multiple colored lights near
the bottom and in the middle. There were no windows or openings of
any kind that we could see. It was 18 to 20 feet in length and
probably ten feet high. With both engines dead as we rounded the
corner we made little noise and the first object did not respond in
time, I estimate that we hit the object at 30 mph with 16,000
trailing tons behind us. It clipped the top of our lead unit then
skipped back slicing a chunk out of our trailing unit and first two
coal cars. The other objects vanished.
Our emergency brakes had initiated due to the loss of power and we
stopped approximately a mile and a half to two miles after impact.
Our power restored after we were stopped and we notified our
dispatcher, located in Jacksonville, Florida of what had happened.
We were told to inspect the cars to see if they'd hold the rail and
try to limp into milepost cmg 60 which used to be the Paintsville
yard which is no longer in full operation. We checked everything out
and the cab of the rear locomotive was demolished and smoking, the
second two cars looked as if they had been hit with a giant hammer,
but looked like they'd hold the rail.
We pulled into Paintsville yard at approximately 5:15 am. The huge
overhead lights lining the yard were noticeably dark and the only
lights came from what we assumed were railroad officials vehicles
parked near the end of the track. We pulled to a stop and began
unloading our grips off the wounded train. We could hear what
sounded like an army of workers immediately tending to our train.
Vehicle doors slamming, guys running by in weird outfits and lights
glaring from all directions, the one thing missing was railroad
officials.
A guy named Ferguson shook my hand and asked me to follow him into
the old yard office. We did, once inside they, and by they I mean I
have no idea who these people were, began to ask us hundreds of
questions, they then told us for our own protection we'd be
medically tested before we could leave. I asked repeatedly to talk
to my road foreman or trainmaster and not only were these requests
denied but they confiscated my conductor’s cellular phone.
Hours later we were led outside the old yard office and the strange
things continued to happen, the 2 locomotives and two cars were
removed from the rest of the train we had brought in and my only
guess was parked 4 tracks over under a huge tent like structure
buzzing with activity. We were led off the property and told, due to
national security, our silence on this matter would be appreciated.
We were then put in a railroad vehicle and taken to Martin, Kentucky
were we went through questioning again with railroad officials and
were then drug tested. After all of this we were sent on to
Shelbiana, where we took rest for 8 hours and worked another train
back to Russell. Working back we passed by Paintsville, no sign of
the engines, cars, tent, people, nothing. Thanks to
source and references:
Peter Davenport |
|
Report & Photographs of UFO Landing in Israel, 11-28-05 |
|
I enclose my report, first published in our convention last week,
and in our website.
We still can’t explain the event, and neither the signs left in the
area.
This is the reason, we send you the report. Maybe someone of your
experts can help us identify what happened here…
We have a total sum of more then 40 photographs and a video footage
(200M in size – about 10 minutes). I enclosed samples of the photos
separately with this e-mail.
I’ll be happy to give you more details if asked, and answer any
question you have about the event…
Sincerely yours,
Hannan Sabat
Webmaster – Israeli Center for UFO research (ICFUFOR)
English site: http://geocities.com/icfufor/
Hebrew site: www.ufoisrael.org
THE REPORT is next:
UFO landing event, in central ISRAEL
Hannan Sabat (ICFUFOR)
Here is the report concerning a UFO landing, which occurred between
Sunday and Monday on the 28th of November, 2005.
The event occurred in one of the agricultural settlements, between
the city of Ramla and the Lod International Airport (central
Israel). According to the witness’s request, we don't publish their
names and the settlement name.
Conclusion:
At 01:30, the witness’s daughter went to take a shower. She heard
noises coming from the yard, and she thought that there is a
possibility that robbers broke into the house, or someone is trying
to steal the vehicle. She turned the lights in the yard on, but she
didn't see anything unusual.
The witness’s mother-in-law told me in the morning, that she heard
the dogs bark, between 02:00-3:00, but she didn't pay any attention
to the dogs.
After 07:00 in the morning, the witness’s wife went out of their
home, and discovered elliptic signs of imprinting in the house yard.
The yard is assembled from hard pressed coarse sand and small
stones. The woman called her husband, and he called the police. The
police send a team of scouts, and then the police called Mr. Abi
Greif (chairman of ICFUFOR).
At first, the dogs didn't want to approach the imprinting, and
avoided entering the area. One of the dogs made its needs near the
imprinting. Only after a few hours, the dogs entered freely to the
imprinting.
The police scouts, checked the house and its surroundings, but
didn't find any clues. When they weren’t able to get into any
conclusions, they indicated in their report, that it is a case of a
UFO. The scouts decided that an object came from above and probably
left in the same direction. They couldn't decide what this object
was. Any signs of an object brought there by someone, or signed of a
dune buggy or any other vehicles, were rejected by the police.
According to the police scouts, a tire sign, seen in the area of the
imprinting, was made there a few days ago. The witness videotaped
the police arrival.
According to the witness, a helicopter hovered above his house,
shortly afterwards (probably to scan the area).
I (Hannan Sabat) arrived to the area (thanks to the witness’s
invitation), about 11:00. Beside the witness’s family, or the
police, no one was allowed to get there. With the witness’s help, I
was allowed to check the area and photograph the imprinting (I used
a T70 CANON camera, and an AGFA color film, ASA-200).
Signs in the area and the signs of the imprinting:
The central imprinting is about 1.5 – 2 meters in diameter.
It had a spiral shape, and reminds an oval elliptic shape.
Extensions, turning outside, where found in the surrounding of the
central spiral shape.
The imprinting was shallow, about 1-2 centimeters in depth. The
imprinting had a different color (brighter) then the soil around it.
Some of the stones in the imprinting area were pulled out, and some
of them remained lying near their original niches.
Next to the main imprinting, a deep ditch was seen. It was about 10
cm deep and 1-1.5 meters in length. The ditch wasn't seen there
before.
Near the ditch a telephone pole found, with soot marks on its two
devices. One of the devices (colored black) was covered with
“V”-shape marks (one above the other). The second device (colored
metal-gray), was covered with some soot. These marks weren’t there
before.
Some of the grass near the imprinting was covered with a gray dusty
material (and thin sand).
Some building blocks, located near the imprinting, changed their
color (according to the witness).
A plastic rope, found next to the building blocks, was stuck to
itself. Also this situation wasn't noticed before the event.
According the witness, there was another smaller imprinting next to
the main one, but the policeman erased it (with their boots), when
they came there.
I took 35 pictures, and the witness made a video footage (about 10
minutes length, additional to his own photographs).
We offer a big thanks to Hannan for sending us the report.
|
|
Sheriff Blinded by Light from UFO; Minnesota-1979 |
|
August 27, 1979-Deputy Sheriff Val Johnson of Marshall County was on
duty that night, driving not far from the North Dakota border, when
at around 1:40 a.m. he saw a light through his side window. It was
obviously not on a road and looked too glaring to be a car
headlight. He first thought it might be a small plane on or very
near the ground. He turned left on another road to try to get closer
to the light to identify it. Suddenly, the light moved toward him,
travelling so fast that it almost instantaneously was upon his car
(covering an estimated mile and a half). Johnson was blinded by the
brilliance of the light and heard glass breaking, then lost
consciousness.
When he returned to consciousness, the car was stalled and had
skidded across the highway. He felt sluggish and shaky. He radioed
headquarters, at 2:19 a.m., to request assistance. Soon another
deputy arrived, who called an ambulance. The doctor who examined
Johnson found him to be in a mild state of shock. His eyes were
irritated as if Johnson had suffered "mild welder's burns," and
Johnson couldn't stand to be exposed to any bright lights.
The patrol car had very peculiar damage. The inside headlight on the
driver's side was smashed but not the one to its immediate left.
There was a flat-bottomed circular dent on the left side of the
front hood, about a half inch in diameter, close to the windshield.
There was a crack in the windshield on the driver's side, that ran
from top to bottom, with four apparent impacts. The electric clock
was running 14 minutes slow, as was Johnson's wristwatch. The shaft
of the roof antenna was bent over at a 60-degree angle, starting
about 6 inches above its base. The trunk antenna was bent over at 90
degrees, but only near the top. No damage occurred to the car's
regular antenna on the front hood. Essentially, all the damage to
the car occurred on the left, or driver's side.
Investigations occurred immediately, both by the sheriff's
department and by investigators from the Center for UFO Studies. The
police determined that Johnson's car traveled about 950 feet after
the first damage occurred. No cause could be found for the event,
including collision with another vehicle or a low-flying plane, a
hoax on the part of Johnson, or anything else. In addition, experts
from Ford Motors (the vehicle was a 1977 Ford LTD) and a team of
engineers from Honeywell examined various portions of the damage.
A windshield expert, Meridan French, from Ford, noted after
examining the windshield fractures that "Even after several days of
reflection on the crack patterns and apparent sequence of fractures,
I still have no explanation for what seem to be inward and outward
forces acting almost simultaneously. I can only [conclude]... that
all cracks were from mechanical forces of unknown origin." No cause
could be found for the clock running slow, the peculiar antenna
damage, or other physical traces.
Fortunately, Johnson's eyes healed quickly, and he suffered no
lasting effect from the close encounter.
Val Johnson's own words...
"This is Deputy Sheriff Val Johnson... I report in connection with
an incident which happened August 27th, 1979, at approximately 1:40
a.m., western section of Marshall County, approximately ten miles
west of Stephen, Minnesota. This officer was on routine patrol,
westbound down Marshall County Road #5. I got to the intersection of
#5 and Minnesota State #220. When I looked down south #220 to check
for traffic, I noticed a very bright, brilliant light, 8 to 12
inches in diameter, 3 to 4 feet off the ground. The edges were very
defined. I thought perhaps at first that it could be an aircraft in
trouble, as it appeared to be a landing light from an aircraft. "
"I proceeded south on #220. I proceeded about a mile and three
tenths or a mile and four tenths when the light intercepted my
vehicle causing damage to a headlight, putting a dent in the hood,
breaking the windshield and bending antennas on top of the vehicle.
At this point. at the interception of the light, I was rendered
either unconscious, neutralized or unknowing for a period of
approximately 39 minutes. From the point of intersection, my Police
vehicle proceeded south in a straight line 854 feet, at which point
the brakes were engaged by forces unknown to myself, as I do not
remember doing this, and I left about approximately 99 feet of black
marks on the highway before coming to rest sideways in the road with
the grille of my hood facing in an easterly direction. At 2:19 a.m.,
I radioed a 10-88 (Officer Needs Assistance) to my dispatcher in
Warren."
"He dispatched an officer from Stephen who came out, ascertained the
situation as best he could, called for the Stephen Ambulance to
transport me to Warren Hospital for further tests, x-rays and
observation.
At the time the officer arrived, I complained about having very sore
eyes. At Warren Hospital, it was diagnosed that I had a mild case of
welder's burns to my eyes. My eyes were treated with some salve and
adhesive bandages put over and instructed to keep them on for the
remainder of the day, or approximately 24 hours. At 11:00 a.m.,
Sheriff Dennis Breckie, my employer, picked me up at my residence in
Oslo, and transported me to an ophthalmologist in Grand Forks, North
Dakota."
" He examined my eyes and said I had some irritation to the inner
portions of the eye which could have been caused by seeing a bright
light after dark. That is all I have to add except to say that my
timepiece in the Police vehicle and my mechanical wrist watch were
both lacking 14 minutes of time to the minute."
The most complete account of this case is in The UFO Encyclopedia:
The Phenomenon from the Beginning by Jerome Clark (1998),
Omnigraphics. Other references include Allan Hendry "Minnesota CEII:
The Val Johnson Story," International UFO Reporter Pt. I, 4
(Sept./Oct. 1979):4-9, and Pt II, 4 (November 1979): 4-10.
|

Police report-click to see full size |

Map of incident-click to see full size |
source:
www.ufoskeptic.org
www.nicap.com
|
THE CARBONDALE UFO CRASH, 11-11-1974 |
|
The
Reality, the Hoaxes and the Legend
M.J. Graeber
THE WELL-PUBLICISED Kecksburg, Pennsylvania UFO crash of
1965 has been touted as "Pennsylvania's Roswell" and
presented as a crash recovery story that has been
shrouded in a veil of mystery and governmental
conspiracy which is intended to keep the truth of the
incident from the American people. But, Lackawanna
County's city of Carbondale, Pennsylvania is also the
location of a "downed saucer incident" that has caught
the imagination and interests of ufologists and
conspiracy enthusiasts throughout the nation. 9-11
November 2004 marked the 30th anniversary of
Pennsylvania's other Roswell incident. - the legendary
Carbondale UFO crash or perhaps, I should call it "The
Carbondale UFO Capers".
As one of the three primary UFO investigators of the
Carbondale saucer crash, I feel that it is time for me
to present my recollections and reflections on this
occurrence, as well as some thoughts on how and why the
legend of the ill-fated Carbondale UFO has become a
gleaming facet of contemporary ufological folklore. So,
let me start my story at the beginning.
I was working quite late on the night of 10 November
1974 (on a design project) and had sketches and
blueprints scattered about on the dining room table and
floor. It was a little after midnight, (actually 11
November) and I had been listening to a local radio talk
show when the programme's host suddenly announced that
his programme director had just handed him a note about
an unidentified flying object which had apparently
crashed at Carbondale, Pennsylvania. Since I had
appeared on WWDB's Bernie Herman show several times
discussing the UFO phenomenon, I phoned the station
without hesitation and asked if the matter was
legitimate or simply a prank. Both the show's host and
his engineer assured me that the report was indeed
"authentic" for they had just taken it directly from an
Associated Press release.
I then contacted the Carbondale police department about
the situation and spoke to a desk officer who told me
that an airborne object had been observed by a group of
five teens (but only three of the youngsters actually
participated in our inquiry of the sighting), and that
the UFO apparently plummeted into a pond and sank. The
youngsters agreed that a fiery object had fallen to
earth in a shower of sparks and splashed down into a
large coal breaker pit or 'silt pond', as it was called
by locals.
The police had cordoned off the area in an attempt to
keep curiosity seekers from possibly getting injured at
the site, as two areas of the bank of the pond were
rather steep and slippery. The acting police chief, Sgt
Francis X. Dottle, confided that he didn't know what the
object in the water was, but that he and a couple of his
men had observed it glowing while submerged on the night
of 9 November - and that it remained aglow until the wee
morning hours of 10 November (i.e. for a period of about
six to eight hours.
As I later learned, the teens who observed the
phenomenon saw a fiery object streak across the sky,
"Coming over Salem Mountain" in the direction of Russell
Park. According to the boys, they ran into the park from
their street corner location where they were just
hanging around on a "nothing else to do" Saturday night
and discovered a strange light glowing in the pond about
twenty feet. from shore. The boys had run about two
blocks to the pond and didn't actually see or hear the
object hit the water. There was a faint "fizz" or
sizzling sound heard, however, and one of the lads said
that "it sounded like someone had thrown a cigarette in
the water." So, too, one boy thought the pond had an
odour "like gas from a gas stove", while another boy
said that "the pond just smelled like it usually does".
The mysterious airborne object was described as being
bright whitish-yellow in colour with a trail of reddish
sparks. It was estimated to appear about as large as a
five cent piece (a nickel) held at arm's length. But one
of the boys would later say that it was about "three
times the size of a basketball". No sounds were noted by
the teens as the object appeared to fall towards the
earth, and they didn't see a trail of smoke coming from
it either. One boy said, "It looked like a shooting
star". However, later versions of the story credit the
boys with saying the object whistled as it sped
earthward.
The boys left the pond to report the submerged light to
the police about 7:00 p.m. and when they returned to the
pond (around 15 minutes later) they thought that the
light had taken up another position in the water,
although no one actually saw the light moving at that
time. The light was described as being yellow-orange in
colour by two of the boys, while the third witness
described it as "yellowish, almost white". The light on
the water's surface appeared as an irregular disc about
5 feet in diameter. While several UFO researchers would
later describe it as being an irregular shaped glow at
20 feet in diameter, I performed a very simple
experiment with a flashlight in a darkened room and
discovered that the central portion of the light's beam
appeared to be about five feet in diameter (when
directed at the ceiling) and its outer, fainter, and
more widely dispersed light beam was about 4 times
larger. This may account for the discrepancy in the
estimates concerning the diameter of the glow on the
pond's surface - or perhaps, the later researchers may
have misinterpreted the boys' statements regarding the
"position" of the light from shore, which was initially
reported to be about twenty feet.
I asked the officer on the phone if the object might
have been a small private plane, fearing that someone
may have been trapped in an air-pocket within the
fuselage's wreckage. He said that the reports indicated
that the object's tremendous speed and the lack of
floating debris on the water seemed to deny that
possibility. I then asked if the object could have been
some sort of "space junk" and informed him that there
were military tracking installations such as NORAD that
should be contacted in regard to the situation. My
primary concern was that if the object were some part of
an American or Soviet spacecraft or satellite which
hadn't completely burned up as it re-entered the Earth's
atmosphere, there may have been a possibility that some
portion of its electrical system was still being powered
by the "snap units" (or nuclear batteries) that were
used to power various on-board instrumentation and
guidance systems.
This seemed to be highly improbable, but, then again,
there was that strange light beneath the pond's surface,
a light which appeared to pulsate with diminishing
intensity and at one point suddenly rushed towards a
small boat which police had launched to further
investigate the matter. But, unknown to me at that time,
Sgt Dottle (the Acting Police Chief) had already been in
contact with Dr J. Allen Hynek's Center for UFO Studies
in Evanston, Illinois about the situation. Dr Hynek
advised Sgt Dottle that a meteor or a meteor fragment
could not be the source of the light in the pond because
burning meteors are immediately extinguished when they
strike bodies of water. Sgt Dottle was further advised
to obtain a Geiger counter to see if any radioactivity
was present at the crash site, perhaps as a result of a
faulty spacecraft or satellite re-entry. Obviously, Dr.
Hynek also feared that a snap unit had survived the
re-entry and may have been leaking its contents into the
pond.
Upon hanging up the phone, I awoke my wife, Grace,
kissed her and our sleeping children goodbye, and
started the early morning trek along the north-eastern
extension of the Pennsylvania Turnpike toward
Carbondale. As I drove through the Lehigh Valley I was
still listening to radio news reports concerning the
incident - and while some of the accounts seemed to be a
bit sketchy, there were relatives of Carbondale
residents phoning the radio station with additional
information and some obvious rumours too.
As the events of the Carbondale saucer crash unfolded,
the rumours would include suspicions that a Soviet
missile was in the pond, that only a portion of a Soviet
missile was in the pond, while still another section had
crashed into Elk Lake about 25 miles north-west of
Carbondale. There was also a rumour that an alien space
ship had landed - not crashed - in the silt pond and
that the military had managed to recover whatever was in
the water and spirit it away before anyone had an
opportunity to see it (i.e., the story was beginning to
take on characteristics of the earlier Kecksburg, Aztec
and Roswell UFO crash reports). In one rumour scenario,
the UFO was loaded upon a flatbed railcar that was
brought to the site on a nearby (albeit, long abandoned)
railroad spur - and in another account, two military
helicopters were used to lift the object from the water
and place it in an armoured truck. Curiously, I too
became linked to a rather ridiculous rumour which placed
me at the scene as a government agent or high ranking
Air Force officer disguised as a UFO field investigator.
But the truth was that I was just a guy who had an
interest in the UFO phenomenon and had been
investigating sighting reports for about two years prior
to the incident. I had been in the US Army 12 years
earlier, as a specialist Fourth Class (i.e. not quite
the equivalent of a corporal) in the infantry. I founded
UFORIC, the Philadelphia-based UFO Report and
Information Center, in 1972 and served as its director
until 1980. I also swept the office floor and emptied
the waste paper basket. I was simply a student of the
phenomenon, not a self-proclaimed expert, and I went to
Carbondale because the reported incident interested me.
UFORIC was a very small research organisation,
consisting of only five volunteer investigators. Many of
our reports were passed on to us by technicians at the
Philadelphia Franklin Institute's Fels Planetarium,
several police departments, both commercial and military
air facilities and two local newspapers - while direct
calls from the public were also received and routinely
investigated.
As I entered the community of Carbondale, about 4:30 -
5:00 a.m. on the morning of 11 November, I asked
directions to the police station and briefly conferred
with detective sergeant Dottle. He informed me that Dr
Hynek was dispatching a UFO field investigator from New
York State to assist the police in their efforts to
identify and possibly recover the object in the pond.
Sgt Dottle then asked if I would assist him until Dr
Hynek's representative arrived and I agreed to do so. I
was then taken to the crash site which was cordoned off
by two Carbondale police officers and a group of
youngsters who were members of the Civil Air Patrol
(i.e., aeronautical boy scouts).
There were not any armed troops or technical military
contingents of any kind present. But I did briefly speak
to an Air Force officer (a major or lieutenant-colonel)
at the pond much later in the day. I believe that he was
involved with the Civil Air Patrol's community service
related activities at the scene. I think that the
officer's name tag read "Merriman". (?) Anyway, several
volunteer fire companies from neighbouring communities
were summoned and they assisted in the recovery efforts
by pumping thousands of gallons of water from the pond
as Sgt Dottle, Dr Hynek's investigator, Mr Dains, Mr
Barry of the 20th Century UFO Bureau and I felt that
this was a far safer method of obtaining a look at the
submerged object than permitting a scuba diver to enter
the water.
By first light, several press people and scores of the
general public were permitted to visit the site, as
various attempts to locate the object were made and
radiological surveys were performed. As the morning wore
on, the news media people were clamouring for a
conclusion to the drama as news story deadlines were
rapidly approaching and the crowds which were estimated
at between 1500 to 3000 people were becoming larger and
larger. I later learned that perhaps as many as 10,000
people had jammed the roads leading into the city in an
attempt to see what was going on. Chief Dottle even had
neighbouring community police departments assist with
the control of the increased traffic into the area. It
looked just like a scene from a science fiction movie
and fears grew that emergency vehicles could not have
got through if they were needed. To make matters worse,
although we hadn't a ghost of an idea of what was
actually in the water, rumours were spreading like a
brush-fire and a few very vocal UFO enthusiasts who were
milling about at the site were questioning the
effectiveness of the police, fire companies and UFO
researchers' retrieval efforts.
Sgt Dottle began to fear that some minor incident
involving the control of the crowds might spark a riot
(or a panic) that his small police force couldn't
possibly handle. Sgt Dottle found himself caught in the
rather unenviable position of being damned if he did and
damned, still, if he didn't do what everyone expected of
him. He wanted to ensure the safety of the public, his
men and the volunteers at the pond, while the media and
the saucer buffs in the crowd were chomping at the bit
for a quick and spectacular climax to the story. The
pressure and anticipation were building with each
passing hour, and while Mr Dains and I shared Chief
Dottle's concerns about safety, we were also concerned
that the mysterious object in the water be spared from
loss or damage by our recovery efforts.
Of course, not everyone was on the same page (i.e.
thinking about safety and the preservation of evidence).
I distinctly recall one persistent and annoying fellow
asking me why we hadn't used more fire companies to do
the pumping. When I replied that we didn't think it
necessary (or prudent) to leave the surrounding
communities without adequate fire protection, he grew
visibly agitated and said "Well, you should be digging
for that damned flying saucer now that the water level
is down a bit!" Somehow, I knew that no matter how far
we dug, if we still hadn't found anything, this guy
would be saying, "Just two more feet and a bit to the
left!" In fact, Sgt Dottle had requested the use of a
large crane fitted with a massive magnet (i.e., the type
used at auto salvage yards) since the pumping operations
which commenced a little before noon hadn't been very
successful, and were taking far longer than anticipated
to complete. Silt, mud and assorted bits of trash in the
pond were clogging the pumping lines and we even had
concerns that the huge magnet might crush whatever was
in the water so we opted to use a backhoe to help lower
the water level of the pond by digging a drainage ditch
from it. This too, was time consuming and there were
concerns that the pond might empty too quickly causing a
deluge of polluted (and possibly radioactive) water to
engulf the area. It seemed that we would have to send in
a diver to take a quick look-see at the object. The
diver, Mr Mark Stamey, age 26, was also a volunteer from
New York State. He drove to the crash scene with a
friend after hearing about the UFO incident on a car
radio. He told me that he felt that all the publicity
about his assistance with the sunken UFO would be a real
boost for his fledgling diving business. Stamey also
asked me to write him a note informing his state parole
officer that I had requested he cross state lines to
assist in the recovery operations.
I told Stamey that I hadn't the authority to do that and
suggested he speak to Mr Dains or Chief Dottle about his
dilemma. I later observed Stamey preparing his diving
equipment and assumed that the question of his parole
status had been straightened out. So, after briefing him
on the scant information we had gathered and conveying
our concerns that the object might still be electrified
and/or radioactive, the diver slipped into his wet suit
and prepared to enter the silt pond.
The UFO researchers were being interviewed by the press
and a TV station's helicopter circled the pond churning
up the water. Although we still hadn't any solid
information on what the object in the water might be, Dr
Hynek's representative and I were starting to suspect
that the incident might be a prank that the teens had
perpetrated on a nothing else to do Saturday night whim.
We thought that perhaps their hoax simply got out of
control and took on a life of its own - and that the
boys may have been too scared to fess up to what they
had done. Of course, it may have been that the boys had
witnessed a meteor or a bolide (a large and occasionally
exploding meteor) streaking across the night sky and
mistakenly assumed that it was the same luminous object
that they discovered moments later in the pond. This
seemed to be a reasonable notion, as the boys'
description of the aerial phenomenon they had observed
was absolutely meteoric in character. In fact, I had
very similar reports on file at the UFO report and
information centre, reports that were later verified by
technicians at the Fels Planetarium. One report stated,
"About twenty stories overhead, a white fiery object
with a red light on the underside about centre -flying
east to west - it had sparks on the sides and coming
from the rear section." The sighting duration was 15
seconds. (Mr Sanford Epstein, Levittown, Pennsylvania,
14 June 1974 - 9:15 p.m. EST).
Moreover, while attempting to discover who had
perpetrated the hoax (if one had been committed?) was
one of the field investigator's tasks, it was quite
naturally, primarily a police matter as a great deal of
the authority’s time and resources were expended during
the 44 hour UFO drama. The UFO researchers’ interests
and responsibilities were to identify the object (if
possible) and to preserve any evidence found from damage
or loss (if possible). They would also gather eyewitness
testimony on the incident to be used in later evaluation
and analysis of the matter and in determining the
veracity of the witnesses. But in the Carbondale case,
the researchers were also presented with the opportunity
and distinct privilege of working with the community's
authorities towards a safe and successful resolution of
the incident. Unlike other "downed UFO incidents" where
UFO investigators and civilian volunteers were
reportedly turned away from the area by the military and
police officials, such was definitely not the case at
Carbondale.
According to the boys, John Lloyd, 14, William Lloyd,
16, and Robert Gillette, 15, the object that they
observed coursing through the evening sky was a
relatively ill-defined flaming mass with a shower of
sparks trailing it as it rapidly travelled on an east to
west course. Report sketches provided by the Lloyd
brothers show an oval object with the descriptive words
"red, yellow and white" printed under the drawing. But
an earlier drawing by Bobby Gillette looks something
like a lens seen on its edge - Gillette's object also
has a red dot in its centre. The teenage trio did not
hear any sounds coming from the object as it descended,
according to their first oral and written accounts - nor
did the boys actually see it plummet into the pond. But
one of the lads would later say that he saw cinders
falling from it. My inspection of the alleged crash site
revealed that there were no topographical indicators to
suggest that something like a plane, a large piece of
space junk or a meteor had impacted the pond or the area
surrounding it.
There wasn't any obvious displacement of earth; there
was no displacement of water from the pond; there were
no indicators of a fire, downed tree limbs or skid marks
creating a gouge in the soil like the one which is said
to have been evident at the J.B. Foster ranch near
Roswell, New Mexico in 1947. Interestingly, the details
of the Roswell UFO story were not very well known by the
general public or the press corps at the time of the
Carbondale incident, but the reported UFO crash at
Kecksburg in the western part of Pennsylvania had
occurred nine years earlier and had received some
attention by the press. But Carbondale's UFO (as a
structural configuration) was not observed on the ground
or while it was in the water. No one knew if it was a
disc, a sphere like Sputnik or a cylindrical craft of
some kind. There was just the glowing 5 foot circle of
light on the water which the boys said had sizzled or
softy hissed for several seconds. Interestingly, while
the police were poking around (in search of the
submerged object) with a long pole that was fitted with
a fish net, the disc of light suddenly charged their
boat and one officer instinctively drew his revolver and
fired at it!
In the pandemonium of the harrowing moment, the officer
lost his balance and fell out of the boat into the silt
pond which was said to have had a bottom like quicksand!
I was unable to confirm this story with police officials
at Carbondale back in 1974, but a deputy sheriff from
the neighbouring community of Honesdale, Pennsylvania
later told Ohio MUFON's chief researcher, Mr Larry
Moyers, that Officer Joseph Jacobina (or Jacobino) had
fired six shots at the on-rushing light. Reportedly,
patrolman Mark Trella (or Eltrilla) thought that he had
snagged the object in the fish net at one point while in
the boat,but it seemed to be quite heavy and slipped
away. It was thought that the attempt had up-ended the
object and the light was either facing down into the
silt or else, it went out entirely. When the pole was
retracted from the water, it was noticed that the fish
net on the end of it was slightly torn. But, the effort
was not completely in vain as it was also noted that the
5 foot in diameter disk of light on the water's surface
appeared to emanate from a much smaller point of light
at the bottom of the pond. In other words, the officers
had observed an apparent cone-of-light in the water.
When Mr Dains took water samples from the pond, I was
surprised to see that the water was basically clear and
one could see for about a depth of 3 to 4 feet into it.
I observed a discarded auto tyre, bits of trash and a
sunken vehicle's roof and hood areas. Of course, looking
at the daylight reflecting off the water's surface made
the water appear to be more opaque, and at certain
angles the pond's silt floor appeared to give the water
a brownish-grey cast. The water was indeed polluted, but
it wasn't very discoloured. Naturally, when the pond's
silt and muddy bottom were disturbed the water did
become very cloudy and murky-looking. The pond was an
abandoned coal cleaning breaker pit that had managed to
fill up with rain water over the years. Mr Dains and I
also walked around the pond with instruments to detect
magnetic disturbances; none were noted.
This cone-of-light seemed to be consistent with Sgt
Dottle's early suspicions that the object was probably a
flashlight. Moreover, Officer Trella's remarks that the
object seemed to be too heavy to be a flashlight were
based on the difficulty that he experienced while
attempting to lift the object in the net on the end of a
10 foot long pole. In fact, he may have even been
struggling with other debris, mud and silt on the pond's
bottom at the time (?). Anyway, it seems that the light
in the water was visible for a period of six to eight
hours - depending upon one's acceptance of the boys'
reported discovery time or the initial observation of it
by the Carbondale police. (i.e. from 7:00-9:00 p.m. on
the night of 9 November to approximately 3:00-3:30 a.m.
on the morning of the 10th).
It is entirely possible that when officer Trella
attempted to retrieve the object in the net and he
thought it had slipped away, he may have caused the
lantern to fall into another location on the bottom of
the pond. Or he may have merely nudged the lantern which
then resettled itself in the silt, thereby creating the
illusion that it was rushing towards the boat.
Additionally, any fisherman can tell you that lifting
things on the end of a pole is strenuous, and that the
object being lifted is perceived to be heavier and
larger than it really is. |
|
|